Enhancing Schemata Based Speaking Task To Promote Students Speaking Performance And Motivation
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) melihat proses aplikasi task yang didisain berdasarkan skimata terhadap kemampuan berbicara; (2) melihat apakah ada perberdaan yang signifikan terhadap kemampuan berbicara dan motivasi; dan (3) aspek apa saja kah dari kemampuan berbicara yang meningkat. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan kepada mahasiswa. Untuk mengumpulkan data, peneliti menggunakan kuisioner, tes dan observasi. Kemudian data dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1)setiap task memiliki tahapan aktivasi skimata yang berbeda; (2) semua task memberi pengaruh signifikan terhadap motivasi dan kemampuan berbicara siswa; and (3) aktifasi skemata dengan menggunakan daftar kata paling meningkatkan kemampuan berbicara siswa. Sesuai dengan temuan tersebut, disarankan agar pengajaran bahasa Inggris mempertimbangkan aktivasi schemata siswa dan kepada peneliti selanjutnya agar membahas lebih lanjut tentang setiap aspek kemampuan berbicara berbasis skemata.
This study was aimed at (1) drawing the process of schemata based speaking task implementation in enhancing students speaking performance effectively;(2) seeing the tasks effect on students speaking performance and motivation; (3) determining which of the task effect the students speaking performance most. This research was conducted to tertiary level students. To collect the data, questionnaire, speaking test and observation were administered. The data were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The result showed that (1)each task has different stages of schemata activation; (2) all of the tasks give significant effect on the students speaking performance and motivation; and (3) among the three tasks, schemata activation by providing word list enhances students speaking performance most. Based on the findings, it is suggested that English lecture should consider the students schemata activation since it may help the students to communicate by using English better. Further discussion on this issue migh focus on each aspect of speaking performance by providing sufficient data.
Keywords: Motivation, schemata, speaking
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alimohadi, Fahime. 2015. Incorporating Schema in the Improvement of Iranian EFL Learners L2 Speaking Ability. Journal of
Applied Linguistics and Language Reseach. 2(8). 100 110.
An, Shuying. 2013. Schema Theory in Reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(1). 130 134.
Ajzen, Icek. 2005. Attitude, Personality and Behavior. New York: Two Penn Plaza.
Bartlett, F. C. 1932. Remembering.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Cited in Hui, Li-rong, Zhu and Yue, Nian. 2010. Aplication of Schemata Theory in Teaching College English Reading. Canada Social Science. 6 (1). 59 65.
Bong, Mimi and Skaalvik,Einar M. 2013. Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different Are They Really?. Educational Psychology Review. 15 (1) ,1-13.
Brown, G. and Yule, G. 2001. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge University Press.
Cahyono, Bambang Y and Widiati, Utami. 2006. The Teaching of EFL Speaking in the Indonesian Context. Bahasa dan Seni Journal, 34 (2), 269 291.
Cravotta, Joseph S. 2001. Second Language Acquisition, Schema, and International Tourism.Bulletin of Osaka Akira College. 1, 51 68.
Dornyei, Z. 2001. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Longman Press.----, 2005. The Psycholohy of the Language Learner: Individual
Differences in Second Langauge Acquisition. London Publisher.
Gardner, R. and W. Lambert. 1959. Motivational variables in second language acquisition, Canadian Journal of Psychology 13: 26672. Cited in Karmos, Judit, Kiddle and Csizer .2011.System of Goals, Attitude, and Self-related Belief in Second-Language- Learning Motivation. Applied Linguistics. 35 (5), 495 516.
Hamed, Akbari and Saiedi. 2014. The Role of Formal Schemata in the Development of Precis Writing in an Iranian RFL Context. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences.98, 207 211.
Hui, Li-rong, Zhu and Yue, Nian. 2010. Aplication of Schemata Theory in Teaching College English Reading. Canada Social Science. 6 (1).
65.
Huda, N. (1997). A national strategy in achieving English communication:ability.Globalization perspectives. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4, 281 292.
Larson, Kasey. 2014. Critical Pedagogy (ies) for ELT in Indonesia. TEFLIN Journal. 25 (1). 122 140.
Lie, Anita. 2007. Education Policy and EFL Curriculum in Indonesia: Between the Commitment to Competence and the Quest for higher Test Scores.18 (1). 1 17.
Liu, Jun. 2001. Asian Students Classroom Communication Patterns in U.S. Universities. USA: Ablex Publishing.
Mai, Ngoc and Thao. 2014. Enhancing Listening Performance through Schema Construction Activities. Journal of Language Teaching and Reseach. 5 (5).
Mahmood, Niko and Boyadi. 2013.The Role of Schrma or Background Knowledge Activation and GraphicOrganizer on Increasing Iranian EFL
Learners Reading Comprehension. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 2 (2), 229 241.
Marcellino, M. 2008. English Language Teaching in Indonesia: A ContinuesChallenge in Education and Cultural Diversity. TEFLIN Journal. 19 (1).57 72.
Marzuki, Ernisa., Bahri, Samsul Ahmed., Pit, Sallina., and Majeri, Falani Faridz. 2013. Schema Influence on Listening and Speaking Input Retention. Issues in Language Studies. 2(2). 53- 69.
Maulana, Daud and Heriansyah. 2016. Students Views on EFL Speaking Problems. Procceeding of the First Reciprocal Graduate Symposium between University Pendidikan Sultan Idris and Syiah Kuala University.1 (1), 34 59.
Nishida, Hiroko. 1999. A Cognitive Approach to Intercultural Communication Based on Schema Theory. International Journal. 23 (5). 753 777.
Richards, Jack C. 2008. Teaching Listening and Speaking from Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Ryan, R. M. and E. L. Deci. 2000.
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, American Psychologist 55: 6878. Cited in Karmos, Judit, Kiddle and Csizer. 2011. System of Goals, Attitude, and Self-related Belief in Second-Language-Learning Motivation. Applied Linguistics. 35 (5), 495 516.
Sayuri. 2016. English SpeakingProblems of EFL Learners of Mulawarman University. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics. 1(1) 47 62.1042 1051.
Shen, Y 2008. An exploration of schema theory in intensive reading, English Language Teaching, 2. 104-107, 2008.Cited in Munsakorn, N.
Schemata as a Springboard for Professional Reading Competence: Activating Schema via Self-Generated Questioning. 5(4). 270 273.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.