Development of Science Literacy-Based Cognitive E-Assessments on Electrolyte Solution Materials And Non Electrolyte

Andrian Saputra, S.Pd., M.Sc., Lisa Tania, Putri Shelviana Sojja

Abstract


Abstract: This study aims to develop a scientific literacy-based cognitive e-assessment on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions and describe the validity, teacher responses, and student responses to the developed e-assessment. The research design used in this study is a research and development (R&D) design according to Borg and Gall (1989). The instruments used in this study were expert validation questionnaires, teacher response questionnaires, and student response questionnaires. The data obtained from validators, teachers, and students were then analyzed by descriptive statistical analysis method. This scientific literacy-based cognitive e-assessment was created to measure students' scientific literacy, namely aspects of knowledge needed for intelligent participation in science-based social problems, aspects of critical thinking skills about science and dealing with scientific expertise, aspects of understanding science and its applications, and aspects of knowledge about the risks and benefits of science. The results of expert validation and teacher responses on aspects of content suitability, construction aspects, and readability aspects indicate a very feasible category. The results of student responses on the construction aspect and the readability aspect showed the criteria were very feasible. Thus, the scientific literacy-based cognitive e-assessment on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solution materials developed can be said to be valid and feasible to use.

 

Keywords: cognitive e-assessment, electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions, scientific literacy.

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan e-asesmen kognitif berbasis literasi sains pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit dan mendeskripsikan validitas, tanggapan guru, dan tanggapan siswa terhadap e-asesmen yang dikembangkan. Desain penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah desain penelitian dan pengembangan (R&D) menurut Borg dan Gall (1989). Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu angket validasi ahli, angket tanggapan guru, dan angket tanggapan siswa. Data yang diperoleh dari validator, guru, dan siswa yang kemudian dianalisis dengan metode analisis statistik deskriptif. E-asesmen kognitif berbasis literasi sains ini dibuat untuk mengukur literasi sains siswa, yaitu aspek pengetahuan yang dibutuhkan untuk partisipasi cerdas dalam masalah sosial berbasis sains, aspek kemampuan berpikir kritis tentang sains dan menangani keahlian ilmiah, aspek memahami sains dan aplikasinya, dan aspek pengetahuan tentang risiko dan manfaat sains. Hasil validasi ahli dan tanggapan guru pada aspek kesesuaian isi, aspek konstruksi, dan aspek keterbacaan menunjukkan kategori sangat layak. Hasil tanggapan siswa pada aspek konstruksi dan aspek keterbacaan menunjukkan kriteria sangat layak. Dengan demikian, e-asesmen kognitif berbasis literasi sains pada materi larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit yang dikembangkan dapat dikatakan valid dan layak digunakan..

 

Kata kunci: e-asesmen kognitif, larutan elektrolit dan non elektrolit, literasi sains.


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v1i2.pp36-42


Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriani. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Pengetahuan Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Hots) Pada Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit. Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia.

Chadwick, R. (2018). Development and assessment of scientific literacy for secondary level science education. Thesis for: Doctor of Philosophy. Dublin City University. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30298.59848

Borg, W. R. & Gall. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction Fifth Edition.London: Longam

Bybee, W. R. (2011). Scientific and Engineering Practices in K–12 Classrooms. Understanding A Framework for K–12 Science Education. NSTA.

Himmah, F. (2017). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Menggunakan Ispring Suite 8 pada Sub Materi Zat Aditif untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP Kelas VIII.Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 5(2). Diperoleh dari https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/18834 .

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 275-288.

Lederman, N.G., Lederman, J.S., & Antink, A., (2014). Meaningful assessment of Learners’ Understamding About Scientific Inquiry-The Views About Scientific Inquiry (VASI) Questionaire. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 65-83.

McLoughlin, J. A. & Lewis, R. B. (1986). Assesing Special Students. Ohio: Merril Publishing Company.

Norris, S. P. & Philips, L. M. 2003. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Vol.87:224–240. Wiley Periodicals. www.interscience.wiley.com

OECD. (2016). Programme for International Student Assesment (PISA) Result PISA from 2015 Indonesia. Diperoleh dari https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA2015-Indonesia.pdf.

OECD. (2000). Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow: Further Results from PISA 2000. Diperoleh dari http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessme ntpisa/33690591.pdf.

Oludipe, D., & Awokoy, J. O. (2010).Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry.Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(1), 30-36.Diperoleh dari http://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/501.

Sari, M. P. (2020). Interactive Multimedia Development using Ispring Suite 9 Application in Natural Sciences Learning of IX Grade in Junior High School. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 21(2) 251–258.Doi :10.52155/IJPSAT.V21.2.1970

Schwartz, S. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Théorie, mesures et applications.French Journal of Sociology, 42(4), 249-288. doi : https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.474.0929

Sudjana. (2005). Metode Statistika. Bandung: Tarsito.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sujadi. (2003). Penelitian dan Pengembangan atau Research and Development (R&D).Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.