COMPARISON OF SOCIAL SCIENCE STUDY OUTCOMES USING A MAKE A MATCH MODEL WITH HANDOUT-ASSISTED SNOWBALL THROWING

Various learning models can eliminate students' boredom while learning. The make a match and snowball throwing learning models are learning models that use a game system. The problem in this study is whether the social studies integrated learning outcomes using the make a match model are better than the snowball throwing learning model assisted by handout media for class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh. This study aims to find out whether the learning outcomes of integrated social studies using the make a match learning model are better than the snowball throwing learning model assisted by media handouts for class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh. This study uses a quantitative approach, with the type of experimental research. Sampling was taken using purposive sampling technique, two classes were taken from class VIII-4 and VIII-5, totaling 60 participants. Data collection techniques using pre-test data and post-test data. Data analysis techniques using the t test. The results of data processing obtained tcount > ttable or 3.13 > 1.67 so that Ha is accepted. It can be concluded that the integrated social studies learning outcomes taught using the Make A Match learning model are better.

Various learning models can eliminate students' boredom while learning.The make a match and snowball throwing learning models are learning models that use a game system.The problem in this study is whether the social studies integrated learning outcomes using the make a match model are better than the snowball throwing learning model assisted by handout media for class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh.This study aims to find out whether the learning outcomes of integrated social studies using the make a match learning model are better than the snowball throwing learning model assisted by media handouts for class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh.This study uses a quantitative approach, with the type of experimental research.Sampling was taken using purposive sampling technique, two classes were taken from class VIII-4 and VIII-5, totaling 60 participants.Data collection techniques using pre-test data and post-test data.Data analysis techniques using the t test.The results of data processing obtained tcount > ttable or 3.13 > 1.67 so that Ha is accepted.It can be concluded that the integrated social studies learning outcomes taught using the Make A Match learning model are better.

Introduction
Education is a conscious and planned effort to create a learning atmosphere and learning process so that students actively develop their potential to have religious spiritual strength, self-control, personality, intelligence, noble character, and the skills needed by themselves, society, nation and state (Department of National Education, 2003).Efforts are made to create a conducive learning atmosphere and learning process by improving the quality of teachers and updating the abilities possessed by teachers, as well as equalizing the distribution of teachers throughout the region.Selection of a learning model that is appropriate to the subject matter and class conditions is a basic strategy that must be owned by a teacher.The selection of learning models is an important role in teaching and learning activities, because it greatly influences the learning outcomes and student activity.The learning model is student-centered, where the teacher gives assignments and questions and provides materials and information designed to help students solve problems.Ismail (2008:27) states that "The learning model make a match is a learning model that invites students to look for answers to a question/pair of a topic through a pair of card games with a predetermined time limit.From the notion of learning models make a match, then it can be concluded that the learning model make a match is a learning model where students are asked to find pairs of their cards, the cards consist of cards containing questions and cards containing answers.One of the advantages of this technique is that students play while learning about concepts or topics in a fun classroom atmosphere.In addition, this model can also be applied to all subjects and levels of education.
Application of cooperative learning model type make a match and snowball throwing media-assisted handout expected to foster enthusiasm for learning and improve their learning outcomes.Make a match is a type of cooperative learning model, where the teacher explains in advance about the material to be discussed, then the teacher prepares cards containing questions and answers, and students are asked to find pairs of these cards.
According to Istarani (2012: 65) the advantages of learning model smake a match a this model creates a new enthusiasm for learning, besides that they can also remember the concept of the lesson easily, but the negative impact is that besides the teacher it is difficult to prepare good questions, time problems are also a factor to consider, because this model takes a lot of time, so The teacher must be able to control the time as well as possible so that this learning model can be implemented in one meeting.
Learning model snowball throwing or rolling snowball is a learning model using paper containing questions made by each student and shaped like a ball and then thrown in turn to students who are in other groups where each of them will answer the questions they get.This model trains students' courage in expressing their opinions and trains their skills in making and answering questions, (Adhiatmika, 2017: 215) Advantage snowball throwing is that students are able to develop their thinking skills, besides that they are also more active in learning, and learning is more effective.Besides having advantages, the modelsnowball throwing also has some drawbacks namely; (a) The group leader is unable to explain properly so that it becomes an obstacle for his members to understand the material to be discussed; (b) Classes are often noisy because groups are made by students; and (c) Students with problems tend to make trouble (Adhiatmika, 2017:218).
Media in the teaching and learning process is defined as graphic, photographic, or electronic tools to capture, process, and rearrange visual or verbal information, educational media are used in the context of communication and teacher and student interaction in the learning process, learning media can clarify the presentation messages and information so as to expedite and improve the process and learning outcomes Mufarokah (2009:104).
According to Syah (2006: 144) the factors that influence student learning are as follows: Internal factors (factors from within the learner), namely physical factors or physical conditions and psychological factors; External factors (factors from outside students), namely environmental conditions around students; The learning approach factor, namely the type of student learning effort which includes the strategies and methods used by students to carry out activities to study the subject matter.
The formulation of the problem in this study is whether social studies learning outcomes are integrated using a cooperative learning model make a match better than the learning model snowball throwing media-assisted handout class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh?
Fitriani Yulianti 20 The purpose of this study was to find out whether social studies learning outcomes were integrated using a type of cooperative learning model make a match better than models snowball throwing media-assisted handout class VIII students of SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh.

Method
This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh which is located at Jalan Teungku Chik, Dipineung Raya No.7, Kota Baru, Kec.Kuta Alam, Banda Aceh, Aceh.This research was conducted in the even semester of the 2021/2022 school year This study uses a quantitative approach, which uses data in the form of numbers and is analyzed statistically.Sugiyono (2018: 8) argues that.This type of research is included in the type of experimental research.The implementation of this study used two different treatments for the experimental class.The first class was given treatment using a learning model make a match, and for the second class using the learning model snowball throwing.The two experimental classes both use the media handout.The initial test was carried out to find out the basic abilities of students, besides that it was also to find out whether there were students who had studied the material at home before being taught by the teacher at school.The initial test was carried out before the learning took place using the learning model make a match and snowball throwing in each class.
The data analysis technique used in this study is a quantitative analysis technique that uses statistical formulas to find out the comparison of the learning outcomes of students in class VIII-4 and students in class VIII-5 at SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh after implementing the learning model.Make a match and snowball throwing media-assisted handout.
The data analysis technique begins with the initial ability analysis technique of students by giving pre-test to the experimental class 1 and experimental class 2 before being given the subject matter.Furthermore, the data is processed using the ANNOVA formula (Analysis of Variances).Furthermore, material is given in two meetings, at the end of the meeting will be given post-test, which aims to determine the learning outcomes of students after being given the material.
The next stage is to test the hypothesis to see the comparison of the two models using the t-test formula.Before doing the t-test, you must first observe the value post-test whether the values are normally distributed and homogeneous by carrying out the normality test and homogeneity test.

Result and Discussion
The implementation of research at SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh aims to see the comparison of student learning outcomes.The data obtained from the research results are pre-test data and post-test data, where pre-test and post-test data are obtained from test scores in experimental class I and experimental class II.Pre-test data is processed using the ANNOVA formula, while post-test data is analyzed using the t-test.Before doing the t-test, first conduct a prerequisite test, namely the normality test and homogeneity test, after passing the prerequisite test the data is analyzed using the polled variance model t-test formula.The pre-test scores of experimental class I and experimental class II students can be seen in Table 1.According to Table 2, to determine the Fcount value, you must first follow the steps of the anova test, namely calculating the total number of squares, calculating the number of squares between groups, calculating the number of squares in the group, and calculating the mean square in the group.
To prove whether H0 is accepted, Fcount is compared with Ftable.From the F distribution table with the value of dkant = m-1 = 2-1 and dkdal = N -m = 60-2 = 58 at a significant level of 5%, Ftabel = 4.01 is obtained.Based on the data above, it is known that Fcount < Ftable means that there is no significant difference between the initial ability scores of students in experimental class I and experimental class II.This is in line with research conducted by Ramadhani, and Aryeni (2017: 410) found that the learning outcomes taught using the make a match type cooperative learning model obtained an average of 76.5, which is better than the learning outcomes of students taught using the snowball throwing type cooperative learning model which obtained an average of 66.The make a match type cooperative learning model had better results than the snowball throwing type cooperative learning model.
The additional findings that are in accordance with this research cited by Aliputri (2018: 70) are not much different from the results of Ramadhani's research experiencing an increase in learning outcomes after using the make a match model from 51% increased to 94%, this shows that student learning outcomes have improved well after using the make a match model.
Another finding that is in accordance with this research cited by Musniati (2008: 18) is not much different from the results of Aliputri and Ramadhani's research from data processing proves that learning outcomes with the make a match method have better results than the scramble learning model, namely the make a match learning model has an average score of 76.75 and the scramble learning model has an average score of 71.

Conclusion
Based on the results of research and discussion, the conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that the learning outcomes of students taught with the make a match learning model are better than using the snowball throwing learning model.This is based on the average value of experimental class I = 76.77 and the average value of experimental class II = 72.75 with the t-test obtained ttabel = 1.67 and thitung = 3.13 significant level of 5% and degrees of freedom (dk) = 58.Based on the value of thitung and ttabel that thitung> ttabel is 3.13> 1.67, so the hypothesis Ha is accepted, it can be concluded that the integrated social studies learning outcomes taught using the Make A Match learning model are better than using the Snowball Throwing learning model.

Table 1 .
Pre-Test Score of Experiment Class I and Experiment Class II Based on the data in Table 1 above, it is known that the pre-test value of students in experimental class I is 40.32 and the pre-test value in experimental class II is 40.17

Table 2 .
Tabulation of Anova calculation

Table 3 .
Post-Test Frequency Distribution List of Experiment Class II not want to provide answers, they prefer to talk with other group members rather than answering and making questions.