The Influence Of Self-Efficacy On Computational Thinking Ability: Meta Synthesis

Ananda Jullailatul Azizia; Scolastika Mariani; Arief Agoestanto; Sugiman Sugiman

The Influence Of Self-Efficacy On Computational Thinking Ability: Meta Synthesis

Ananda Jullailatul Azizia, Scolastika Mariani, Arief Agoestanto, Sugiman Sugiman

Abstract

This study aims to describe the effect of self-efficacy on computational thinking skills, especially in mathematics learning. The method used in this research is meta synthesis as a qualitative systematic review by analyzing 4 journals that are relevant to the research title. The first step is to formulate a research problem, then proceed by tracing existing studies that are relevant to the research title which is then analyzed in depth. The data collection technique uses non-testing by reviewing previous research with similar problems so that the results and conclusions are obtained. The results of the analysis obtained the conclusion that self-efficacy affects the ability to think computationally. The higher the level of self-efficacy, the better the ability to describe important information from the problem, the ability to determine the problem pattern, the ability to mention the problem pattern, and the ability to solve problems with mathematical concepts that need to be used.

Keywords: self-efficacy; computational thinking; mathematics education

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan pengaruh self – efficacy terhadap kemampuan berpikir komputasional khususnya pada pembelajaran matematika. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini ialah meta sintesis sebagai systematic review kualitatif yakni dengan menganalisis 4 jurnal yang relevan dengan judul penelitian. Langkah pertama ialah merumuskan masalah penelitian, kemudian dilanjutkan dengan menelusuri penelitian-penelitian yang sudah ada dan relevan dengan judul penelitian yang selanjutnya dianalisis secara mendalam. Adapun teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan non-tes dengan cara mengkaji penelitian terdahulu dengan masalah yang serupa sehingga diperoleh hasil dan kesimpulannya. Hasil analisis diperoleh kesimpulan self-efficacy berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir komputasional. Semakin tinggi tingkat self efficacy maka semakin baik pula kemampuan mendeskripsikan informasi penting dari masalah, kemampuan menentukan pola masalah, kemampuan menyebutkan pola masalah, dan kemampuan memecahkan masalah. masalah dengan konsep matematika yang perlu digunakan.

Kata Kunci: Self-efficacy; berpikir komputasional; pembelajaran matematika

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/mtk/v12i3.pp189-202

Full Text:

PDF (ENGLISH)

References

Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and computational thinking. The Computer Journal, 55(7), 832–835.

Ansori, M. (2020). Pemikiran komputasi (computational thinking) dalam pemecahan masalah. Dirasah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Dan Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 111–126.

Azizia, A. J., Kusmaryono, I., Maharani, H. R., & Arifuddin, A. (2023). Students' Computational Thinking Process in Solving PISA Problems of Change and Relationship Content Reviewed from Students’ Self Efficacy. EduMa: Mathematics education learning and teaching‏‏‎, 12(1), 112-125.

Bandura, A., & Cherry, L. (2020). Enlisting the power of youth for climate change. American Psychologist, 75(7), 945.

Begum, S., Flowers, N., Tan, K., Carpenter, D. M. H., & Moser, K. (2021). Promoting literacy and numeracy among middle school students: Exploring the mediating role of self-efficacy and gender differences. International Journal of Educational Research, 106, 101722.

Bjerke, A. H., & Solomon, Y. (2020). Developing self-efficacy in teaching mathematics: Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the role of subject knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 692–705.

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education-Implications for policy and practice. Joint Research Centre (Seville site).

Cahdriyana, R. A., & Richardo, R. (2020). Berpikir komputasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Literasi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(1), 50–56.

Francis, C., & Baldesari. (2006). Systematic Reviews of Qualitative Literature. UK Cochrane Centre.

Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26, 175–192.

Kalelioğlu, F. (2018). Characteristics of studies conducted on computational thinking: A content analysis. Computational Thinking in the STEM Disciplines: Foundations and Research Highlights, 11–29.

Krisnawwati, Y., Sampoerno, P. D., & Meiliasari, M. (2022). Meta-Sintesis: Penggunaan design research dengan pendekatan matematika realistik dalam mengembangkan media pembelajaran matematika untuk meningkatkan pemahaman dan motivasi siswa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 2075–2085.

Kukul, V., & Karatas, S. (2019). Computational thinking self-efficacy scale: Development, validity and reliability. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 151–164.

Kusmaryono, I. (2018). Analysis Of Students’ Incorrect Answers In A Mathematical Test: An Insight On Students’ Learning Based On Solo Taxonomy And Error Analysis. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 23(1), 1–8.

Lewin, S. (2008). Methods to synthesise qualitative evidence alongside a Cochrane intervention review. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Litia, N., Sinaga, B., & Mulyono, M. (2023). Profil berpikir komputasi siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) ditinjau dari gaya belajar di SMA N 1 Langsa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1508–1518.

Marom, S., Waluya, S. B., Mariani, S., & Susilo, B. E. (2023). Computational Thinking Patterns In The Mathematical Modeling Process: Self-Efficacy Pre-Service Mathematics Teacher. The Seybold Report, 18(03), 1551-1568.

Mukhibin, A., Herman, T., Cahya, E., & Utomo, D. A. S. (2024). Kemampuan computational thinking siswa pada materi garis dan sudut ditinjau dari self-efficacy. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 7(1), 143-152.

Novianti, I., Darminto, B. P., & Purwoko, R. Y. (2018). Penerapan model snowball throwing terhadap pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari self efficacy. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, 6, 295–300.

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 : Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en

OECD. (2018). PISA 2021 MATHEMATICS FRAMEWORK (DRAFT). 2nd draft 32-40. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.

Orton, K., Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Jona, K., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Bringing computational thinking into high school mathematics and science classrooms. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

Pewkam, W., & Chamrat, S. (2022). Pre-service teacher training program of STEM-based activities in computing science to develop computational thinking. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 311–329.

Rahmadhani, L. I. P., & Mariani, S. (2021, February). Kemampuan komputasional siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika SMP melalui digital project based learning ditinjau dari self efficacy. In PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 4, 289-297.

Sartina, D., Maylani, S., & Limiansih, K. (2023). Integrasi computational thinking dalam pembelajaran proyek topik energi alternatif kelas III sekolah dasar. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(3), 294–304.

Siswanto, S. (2010). Systematic review sebagai metode penelitian untuk mensintesis hasil-hasil penelitian (sebuah pengantar). Buletin Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan, 13(4), 21312.

Susiani, N. E. (2021). MELATIH METAKOGNISI SISWA DALAM MENUMBUH KEMBANGKAN EFIKASI DIRI (SELF-EFFICACY PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA. EDUCATOR: Jurnal Inovasi Tenaga Pendidik Dan Kependidikan, 1(1), 31–38.

Tsai, M.-J., Wang, C.-Y., & Hsu, P.-F. (2019). Developing the computer programming self-efficacy scale for computer literacy education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1345–1360.

Walsh, D., & Downe, S. (2005). Meta‐synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204–211.

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 127–147.

Wing, J. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7–14.