PENGUATAN KEMAMPUAN GURU IPA SMP DI LAMPUNG SELATAN DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN BAHAN AJAR BERBASIS PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DENGAN MODEL ARGUMENT-DRIVEN INQUIRY

Neni Hasnunidah, Arwin Surbakti, Median Agus Priadi, Wisnu Juli Wiono

Abstract


Abstrak

Pengembangan profesionalitas guru terutama harus didasarkan pada kebutuhan individu guru itu sendiri, selain kebutuhan institusi dan kelompok guru. Selama ini terindikasi bahwa guru terutama pada jenjang SMP/MTs mengalami kendala dalam menyusun program pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan saintifik, apalagi dalam mengimplementasikannya. Kegiatan Pelaksanaan Iptek bagi Masyarakat (IbM) telah diselenggarakan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman dan keterampilan guru-guru IPA SMP di Kabupten Lampung Selatan dalam mengembangkan bahan ajar berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model pembelajaran Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI). Dosen sebagai nara sumber sekaligus pakar pendidikan dalam sistem pembinaan profesional guru mengkoordinir pelaksanaan program dan implementasinya. Hasil kegiatan IbM ini menunjukkan adanya peningkatan pemahaman guru tentang perancangan bahan ajar IPA SMP berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry. Keterampilan guru meningkat terutama dalam menyusun Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) IPA SMP berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan model ADI. Dengan demikian, kegiatan pengabdian yang dilakukan telah berjalan secara efektif dan sesuai dengan hasil yang diharapkan.

 

Kata Kunci: argument-driven inquiry; pendekatan saintifik; profesionalitas

 

Abstract

The development of teacher professionalism must primarily be based on the individual needs of the teacher himself, in addition to the needs of the institution and group of teachers. So far, it has been indicated that teachers, especially at the SMP/MTs level, have problems in developing a scientific approach based learning program, especially in implementing it. The implementation of Science and Technology for Society (IbM) has been held to improve the understanding and skills of junior high school science teachers at South Lampung in developing teaching material based on scientific approach with the Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model. Lecturers as resource persons and education experts in the development of teacher professionalism coordinate the implementation of the program and its implementation. The results of the implementation this IbM indicate an increase in teacher understanding of the design of junior high school science teaching materials based on the scientific approach with the Argument-Driven Inquiry learning model. Teacher skills are improved, especially in compiling a Science Worksheet for Students in a Junior High School based on a scientific approach with argumentation. Therefore, the implementation of IbM carried out effectively and in accordance with the expected results.

 

Keywords: argument-driven inquiry; professionalism; scientific approach

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/rp/v2i1.hal.10-25


Keywords


Profesionalitas, Pendekatan saintifik, Argument-Driven Inquiry

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman. 2015. Guru Sains Sebagai Inovator, Merancang Pembelajaran Sains Inovatif Berbasis Riset. Media Akademi. Yogjakarta.

Arikunto. 2010. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. Jakarta.

Aufschnaiter, V. A., Eduran, S, Osborne, J. & Simon S. 2007. Argumentation and The Learning of Science Dalam Pinto R., Causo, D (Eds), Contribution for Science Education Research (hlm.377-388). London: Springer.

Cross, D., Taasoobshirazi, G., Hendricks, S., & Hickey, D. 2008. Argumentation: a Strategy for Improving Achievement and Revealing Scientific Identities. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (6):837-861. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701411567.

Hasnunidah, N., Rosidin, U, dan Kadaritna, N. 2018a. Pendekatan Saintifik Sebagai Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dan Permasalahan Pembelajarannya Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA SMP di Kota Bandar Lampung. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi. Universitas Negeri Mataram. 30 September 2017.

Hasnunidah, N. 2018b. Pengembangan Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran dengan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Keterampilan Argumentasi, Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis, dan Pemahaman Konsep IPA SMP Siswa Berkemampuan Akademik Berbeda di Kota Bandar Lampung. Laporan Penelitian. Tidak diterbitkan. Universitas Lampung.

Jacob, S. M. 2012. Mathematical Achievement and Critical Thinking Skills in Asynchronous Discussion Forums. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31: 800 – 804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.144.

Hake, R.R. 1999. Analizing Change/Gain Score. Diakses dari http://lists.asu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=aera-d&P=R6855.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2014. Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015: Mata Pelajaran IPA Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTS). Jakarta.

Machin, A. 2014. Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik, Penanaman Karakter, dan Konservasi pada Pembelajaran Materi Pertumbuhan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 3 (1) (2014) 28-35. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v3i1.2898.

Marttunen, M. 1994. Assessing Argumentation Skills Among Finnish University Students. Learning and Instruction, 4 (94): 175-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90010-8.

OECD. 2009. Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. OECD Publishing Paris.

Piaget, J. 1964. Part I Cognitive Developmet in Children: Piaget Development and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 2. p. 176 – 186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306.

Prastowo, A. 2011. Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Diva Press. Yogyakarta.

Sampson, V. & Gleim, L. 2009. Argument-Driven Inquiry to Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts & Practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher Journal, 71 (8): 465-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1662/005.071.0805.

Sampson, V. E., Grooms, J. and Walker, J. P. 2011. Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments, an Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95: 217 - 257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421.

Sobri, A.Y. 2016. Model-model Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru. Konvensi Nasional Pendidikan Indonesia VIII Tahun 2016. 339‒342.

Tanang, H. dan Abu, B. 2014. Teacher Profesionalism and Professional Development Practices in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 3(2), 25‒42. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v3n2p25.

Trianto. 2007. Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Dalam Teori dan Praktek. Prestasi Pustaka Publisher. Surabaya

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru Dan Dosen.

Zhang, G., et. al. 2011. Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57‒83. http://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/index.php/jheoe/article/view/628.

Zubaidah, S. 2010. Berpikir Kritis: Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi yang Dapat Dikembangkan melalui Pembelajaran Sains. Makalah disaijkan dalam Seminar Nasional Sains di Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Surabaya, 16 Januari 2010.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexing by: 

           

 

 

Creative Commons License

Ruang Pengabdian: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat  is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International LicenseCopyright © Mathematics and Science Education Department, Universitas LampungAll rights reservedp-ISSN 2807-2251e-ISSN 2798-9453