Model Pembelajaran Sinektik Berbasis STTDG-RWAPS Dengan Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMP

Sumarti Gufron Diyah

Abstract


This study aims to describe the design of the STTDG-RWAPS Indonesian Language learning model by strengthening characteristics education (affective value and critical attitude). This study used a qualitative approach with phenomenological methods. The research design used was descriptive -qualitative. The data were taken from all the teachers' directive speech acts in learning Indonesian in class VII, VIII, IX. The source of this research data is Indonesian language teachers who come from different ethnic groups, namely Lampung, Palembang, Sunda, and Java. Based on the qualitative data analysis of the students' answers to the open questionnaire, it was found that all students (100%) were happy to take part in the study using the STTDG-RWAPS-based synectic model. This can be seen from the score of the writing ability average of students who reached 7.5 or good. In fact, there are students’ writings that can be said to be very good (score 95) because the ideas written are very interesting, the use of rules-compliant language.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan desain model pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia berbasis STTDG-RWAPS dengan penguatan pendidikan karakter (nilai afektif dan sikap kritis). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode fenomenologis dengan demikian, desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif-kualitatif . Data penelitian meliputi semua tindak tutur direktif guru dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di kelas VII, VIII, IX. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah guru Bahasa Indonesia yang berasal dari suku bangsa yang berbeda, yakni Lampung, Palembang, Sunda, dan Jawa. Berdasarkan analisis data kualitatif jawaban siswa pada angket terbuka diketahui bahwa seluruh siswa (100%) merasa senang mengikuti pembelajaran tersebut dengan model sinektik berbasis STTDG-RWAPS.

Kata Kunci: Pembelajaran, STTDG-RWAPS, fenomenologis , model sinektik

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Hadis. 2006. Psikologi dalam Pendidikan. Bandung : Alvabeta CV

Burhanuddin Salam. 2002. Pengantar Pedagogik (Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Mendidik). Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta

Fried, L.J. 2011. Emotion and motivation regulation strategy use in the middle school classroom. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Volume 36. [online] diakses dari http//www.ecu.edu.au/egi/viewcontent.egi/article 1543&context=ajte. 01 November 2013.

Iskandar. 2009. Psikologi Pendidikan (Sebuah Orientasi Baru). Cipayung : Gaung Persada Press

Joyce, Bruce, Marsha Weil, and Emily Calhoun. (2011). Models of Teaching. Eighth Edition. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Joyce, Bruce, Marsha Weil, and Emily Calhoun. (2011). Model-Model Pembelajaran Terjemahan Models of Teaching. Edisis Kedelapan. (penerjemah Ahmad Fawaid dan Ateilla Mirza). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

-----------. Terjemahan Oka, M.D.D. 1993. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics: Cambridge University Press.

Lickona, Thomas. (2012). Terjemahan Educating fo Character: How Our Schools can Teech Respect and Responsibility. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Lickona. 2012. Mendidik untuk Membentuk Karakter. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper&Row.

McDonald, Emma S. and Dyan M. Hershman. (2011). Guru dan Kelas Cemerlang. Jakarta: PT Indeks

McMillan, J. (2008). Educational research: fundamental for the consumer. USA: Pearson Education, Inc

M. Noor Syam, dkk. Pengantar Dasar-Dasar Pendidikan. Surabaya : Usaha Nasional

Nana Syaodih Sukmadinata. 2005. Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung : PT Remaja Posdakarya

Nurbaya. 2013. Pedagogik Berbasis Nilai Afeksi dan Pedagogik Kritis Alternatif Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Prosiding Seminar Iternasional. UNS.

Saidan Lubis, Pola Pendidik dan Peserta Didik dalam Pendidikan dan Pelatihan,(http://bdkpadang.kemenag.go.id/index.php. Diakses 27 April 2013)

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, N.S. 2012. Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: SPS UPI dan PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sumarti. 2015. Strategi Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru dan Respons Warna Afektif Siswa (Prosiding) ADOBSI. Solo: UNS.

Sumarti, Iing Sunarti, Mulyanto Widodo. 2018. The Fulfilment of Student’s DeficiencyNeed by Teacher’s Directive Speech Act Strategy. Proceedings of the fourth prsasti international seminar on linguistics. Atlantis Press. Doi: https://dot.org/10.2991/prasasti-18.2018.80.

Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional pasal 1 ayat (1)UU No.14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen

Yule, Geoge. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yusuf, L.N.S. 2005. Psikologi perkembangan anak dan remaja. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Zhang, Q. 2007. Teacher request politeness: effects on student positive emotions and compliance intention. Jurnal Human Communication. A Publication of the Pacific and Asian Communication Association. Vol. 14, No 4, hlm. 347-356. [online] diakses dari http://www.uab.edu//Communication-studies/humancommunication/04_02_2011_Zhang.pdf.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.