CORRELATION BETWEEN LLS OF READING AND STUDENTS' READING ENGLISH AND INDONESIAN ACHIEVEMENT

Desi Fitri, Ag. Bambang Setiyadi, Sudirman Sudirman

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan strategi belajar dalam membaca terhadap hasil membaca Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis deskriptif, di mana penulis menganalisis dan memaparkan strategi belajar siswa yang digunakan dalam pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia dan Bahasa Inggris dalam kuesioner strategi belajar. Subyek penelitian ini adalah siswa XII IPA1 dan XII IPS4 berjumlah 59 orang. Penulis memberikan kuesioner untuk mengklasifikasikan strategi belajar siswa dalam Bahasa Indonesia, terdiri dari 20 pertanyaan tentang strategi kognitif, metacognitif dan sosial. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa tidak ada korelasi yang signifikan antara strategi membaca siswa dengan prestasi siswa. Namun, sebagian besar siswa menggabungkan strategi belajar. Rata-rata nilai strategi belajar yang dipilih, kognitif, metakognitif, dan sosial adalah 3.36 dan 3.38, 3.55 dan 3.62, 3.07 dan 3.19.

The objective of this research was to find out the correlation of learning strategies in reading toward reading achievement in Indonesian and English subject. This research used descriptive analysis in which the writer analyzed and described students language learning strategies that was used in Indonesian and English subject on language learning strategies questionnaire. The subjects of this research were class XII IPA 1 and XII IPS 4 that consists of 59 students. The writer distributed questionnaire to classify students' learning strategies in Bahasa which consists of 20 questions about cognitive, metacognitive, and social strategies. The result showed there was no significant correlation between students' strategies in reading and students achievement, but most of students combine each strategy in learning process. The mean score of learning strategies preferences, cognitive, metacognitive, and social strategies are 3.36 and 3.38, 3.55 and 3.62, 3.07 and 3.19.

Keywords: achievement, language learning strategies, reading comprehension.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, A. L. 1987. Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more more mysterious mechanism.In F.E. Weinert& R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65 -156). Hillsdale, New Jersy: Lawrence Erlbalum Associates.

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Natural Language Syntax. Netherlands: Mouton & Co. Krashen, S. D. 1982. Principles and Practices in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.

Oxford,Rebecca, L. 1990. Language Learning Strategies// What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Pubblisher.

Setiyadi, Ag. Bambang. 2006. Metode Penelitian Untuk Pengajaran Bahasa Asing. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu.

Wixson, K K., & Peters, C. W. 1987.Comprehension Assesment: Implementingan interactive view of Reading. Educational Psychologist, 22, 333-356.

Wenden, A.and J. Rubin. 1987. Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Boston: Pretince Hall.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)