Designing Task Complexity On The Quantity Of Interaction And Negotiation Of Meaning
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada atau tidak perbedaan dari tipe kompleksitas tugas yang dapat menghasilkan kuantitas dari berbicara dan untuk mencari apakah ada atau tidak perbedaan dari tipe tugas kompleksitas yang dapat menghasilkan negosiasi makna. Satu kelompok mengulangi tindakan perancangan yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini. Subjek penelitian adalah 30 siswa IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. Peneliti menggunakan tugas berbicara sebagai alat ukur dalam penelitian. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik antara jenis kompleksitas tugas dan kuantitas interaksi. Perbedaan signifikan dianalisis dalam hal kuantitas interaksi siswa; jumlah berbicara, giliran berbicara dan jumlah c-unit. Selanjutnya, tugas yang dirancang khusus berdasarkan pengetahuan dan perencanaan sebelumnya memicu siswa untuk menghasilkan negosiasi arti yang paling banyak.
The purpose of this study is to find out whether or not different types of task complexity produce quantity of interaction and to find out whether or not different types of task complexity produce negotiation of meaning. One group repeated measures design was carried out in this research. The subjects of the research were 30 students of IAIN Raden Intan Lampung. The researcher used speaking test as the instruments of this research. The speaking test contained of simple and complex of task complexity which had been distributed to the students. The result of analysis shows that there is a statistically significant differences between types of task complexity and the quantity of interaction. The significant differences were analyzed in terms of students interaction quantity; they are length time, turns taken and the number of c- unit. Furthermore, the task which was specifically designed on the basis of prior knowledge and planning triggered the students to produce the most negotiation of meaning.
Keywords: Negotiation of meaning, quantity of interaction, task complexity.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alemi, Minoo and Saman Ebadi. (2010). The effects of pre-reading activities on ESP reading comprehension. Finlandia: JLTR academy publisher. Vol. 1, No. 5
Mahpul. (2014). Task difficulty in dialogic oral production by Indonesian EFL learners. Perth: Curtin University. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
Mohammadi, Zohre. (2015). Negotiation of meaning in required and optional information exchange tasks: discourse issues. Iran : International journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature Vol. 4 No.1
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design and adult task based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2). 45 - 105.
Robinson, P. (2015). The cognition hypothesis second language task demands and the SSAC model of pedagogic task sequencing. Research Gate. 283506103.
Rahayu, Desi. (2016). Negotiation of meaning by the second year students with extrovert and introvert personalities at SMA Al-Kautsar Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University. Unpublished Bachelors Thesis.
Troike, Muriel Savile. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. London: Cambridge University Press.
Zhao, Xiaoguang and Lei Zhu. (2012). Schemata theory and college English reading teaching. Beijing: Canadian center of science and education.
Yufrizal, Hery.(2007). Negotiation of meaning by Indonesia EFL learners. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2017 U-JET
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.